An overview of scientific literature on the reproductive health of transsexuals and sexes published in the journal Issues of sexual and reproductive health Indicates the need for additional and improved research.
Madina Agénor, SCD, MPH, is the assistant professor of race, culture and society of Gerald R. Gill. He also works as an assistant professor at both the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Medical School of Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts and at the Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston. She and her colleagues carried out the review.
A research librarian gathered magazines published between 2000 and 2018 by Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scholar Google, gender studies database, sex clock and Web of Science Core. All studies concerned the topic of reproductive health and used search terms of reproductive health, reproductive health care, gynecology, obstetrics, pregnancy, contraception, abortions, fertility, reproduction, reproduction, reproduction, reproduction, reproduction, reproduction, Care, postnatal care, birth, abolition, courtyard, courtyard.
All selected studies were either qualitative or quantitatively empirical, had human participants, were written in English and contained detailed data on sexual and gender transsexuals. According to the authors, the studies were limited “in transgender and gender differentiated reproductive health experiences, preferences, concerns, needs or priorities”, rather than observations form others.1 The researchers gathered 2197 unique articles with summaries and references.
A total of 75 articles were selected for a full text review by 2 independent auditors. The data was obtained from 37 revised articles that were collected and summarized and then analyzed using a numerical summary and an approach to thematic analysis, according to the authors.
The researchers noticed that the literature on reproductive health in transsexuals and sex was limited. Most studies focused on transsexuals and gender assigned females at birth (AFAB). The researchers watched a few articles completely or including transsexuals and gender assigned male at birth (Amab).
“Similarly, no study focused exclusively on different sexes (eg non-two-dimensional, gender liquid, non-compliant, gender, parachute) and almost all that included both the transgenic and gender that was different from the gender, they gathered the data.”1
The researchers concluded that more studies should be done, in addition to improving the design of the study. While the amount of studies increased between 2010 and 2018, the authors said the research was addressed to specific countries, study plans, populations and reproductive health issues. The authors noted that studies should cover a wider range of problems of reproductive health, including contraception, abortion and birth.
The authors said that more studies for wider populations are needed, including differentiated amab and sex people.
In addition, transsexuals and tribes differentiate people who come from undervalued and marginalized populations, including blacks, natives, Latinoids, Asian/peaceful islands, adolescents and poor and low -income, need more studies.1 The authors noted that the various and the various sex people from the world south need more focus, as most studies came from the world north and in particular the United States. The researchers stressed that these studies should be guided by the cross -section, which faces the overlapping challenges of sex, race, sexual orientation and financial status, to be more effective.
The authors explained that research is needed that “uses approaches to intervention, implementation of science and community”.1 They added that practices, programs and policies are required that cover the various obstacles to reproductive health for these populations.
“Sanitary care providers should take continuous training in transsexual and sex different reproductive health, centered gender -centered, care confirmed by gender, transphobia, health care and other forms Facilitating the access and use of high quality and health care to respect the access and use of TransgendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendenndendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendenndendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendenndendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendenndendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendendenNENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDENDING Different experiences of people and the needs of reproductive health, “the authors wrote.1
They proposed the re -examination of the brand’s breeding health as only for women’s health and encouraged practices to be excluded and to confirm people who differ from transsexuals and gender through educational materials, training of staff, design, of offering a way of mentioning discrimination.
The authors also encouraged community -based funding, which specifically serves these transsexual and gender populations.
