There is one reason that US control and prevention centers forbid not only smoking but also aromatic or aromatic products in its buildings.
In a recent review entitled “Bull Impact of Household Cleaning Products on Lungs”, researchers famous: “The undesirable respiratory effects of cleaning products were initially observed in populations facing high levels of workplace exposure, such as cleaners and workers in the field of health care, with primary emphasis on asthma.” Professional use of disinfectants was also connected at a higher risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, such as emphysema.
As I discuss in my video Favorite Favorites: The impact of cleaning products and deodorant air on lung operationNow we know that, in addition to the workplace reports emerging as a risk factor for respiratory disorders in childhood ‘, as well as possibly existence “An important risk factor for adult asthma.” Sharing household cleaning sprays represents up to one in seven cases of adult asthma. The thought is that inhalation of chemical irritants can cause Injury to the airways, leading to oxidative stress and inflammation. What can we do about it?
Well, it can be limited in spray. The researchers found that non -sprayed cleaning products were not associated with asthma. Also likely to be environmentally friendly cleaning products ” represent A safer alternative “, although they may have a risk.
Ideally, the safest cleaning products must is available. Unfortunately, surveys suggesting that the damage is rarely taken into account by manufacturers, sellers and commercial cleaning companies “. I wonder how much of this is because “most of the workers exposed to cleaning products are women” – both professionally and, perhaps, in the domestic market.
One of the problems can is Chemical fragrances. One in three Americans was asked “health problems, such as migraine headaches and respiratory difficulties when exposed to aromatic products”. And, for about half of them, the problems were so bad that they really lost work over it, either “business days or a job due to the flavored exposure of products to the workplace”.
“The results of this study reveal that more than a third of Americans suffer from adverse health effects, such as respiratory difficulties and migraine headaches, from exposure to aromatic products.
The effect on asthma may be even worse, moving closer to two -thirds of Americans. A compound that can cause particular concern is called 1,4-dichlorobenzole, also known as Para-Dichlorobenzene, which is located in many air deodorants, deodorants of toilet and Mothballs. The breaks Down to the body in a compound called 2.5-dichlorofhenol, which we take out, giving researchers a reliable measure of our dichlorobenzol exposure. Not only can brand Respiratory problems worse for those already suffering from compromised air ducts but exposure to dichlorobenzol ” [blood] flat establish In the US general population can lead to reduced pulmonary [lung] Operation “to people starting with normal breathing. connected with more CVD dominance [cardiovascular disease] And all cancers in combination “, another reason to avoid it. We should read the labels better, right?
Paradoxically, “there is no law in the US requires The revelation of all ingredients in aromatic consumer products. “In fact, for laundry types, cleaning products and air flirting, manufacturers” do not need to list the presence of a “fragrance” either on the label or on the MSDS “, the security sheet.
I support American centers for disease control and prohibition of prevention. Not only the use of tobacco products (including cigarettes, cigars, pipes, tobacco without tobacco or other tobacco products) …prohibited At any time “, but at all times the” aromatic or aromatic products are prohibited, in all interiors they belong to, rented or rented by CDC “. I wish Rideshare services such as Uber and Lyft will have a similar policy. said They will “enter a business, but then they will leave as soon as possible if the deodorants of air or some aromatic product were smelled”, so they are in the interests of businesses. “Over 50% of the population would prefer that the workplaces, healthcare facilities and professionals, hotels and airplanes were fragrance.”
