Every October, we celebrate Substance Use Prevention Month — an opportunity to highlight the importance of prevention and the positive impact prevention has on individuals, families and communities across the country. Substance use prevention is a major priority for the Biden-Harris administration, as evidenced by the US Department of Health and Human Services.” Overdose Prevention Strategy.
This year, we also celebrate its 20th anniversary Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF), an evidence-based strategic planning and implementation process that provides states and communities with a roadmap for prevention action.
In 2004, the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) first released the SPF, which offers a five-step model for designing effective initiatives to prevent substance use and related harm. The model is used by states, tribes, territories, jurisdictions, local governments, communities, coalitions, community-based organizations, colleges and universities.
Twenty years later, the SPF continues to be highly effective, offering prevention practitioners and public health leaders a clear framework for creating strategic prevention activities, allocating resources effectively, and ensuring that interventions are evidence-based and well-evaluated.
What made SPF unique when it first came out — and what keeps it relevant today — is its premise. That is, effective prevention begins with a clear understanding of local community needs, and planning must involve community members (in all five steps) as well as use data to drive planning and implementation.
At a time when people were sometimes eager to find solutions, SPF required communities to take a step back. to effectively plan before acting. It challenged them to connect with key partners, consider the myriad factors that could affect the problems they hoped to address, consider the intended outcomes, and think strategically about how best to achieve those outcomes—focusing community voices on those efforts.
The SPF emphasizes using data to guide all prevention decisions — from identifying which problems to focus on, choosing the best ways to address them, to assessing the progress that has been made. It also highlights the role of community capacity (resources and preparedness). Without capacity, the best-laid programs are likely to fail.
SPF offers a flexible template that can mature over time.
- Since 2004, our understanding of the complexities of substance use has evolved. We now recognize how adverse childhood experiences, intergenerational trauma, and social determinants of health (SDOH) can contribute to patterns of substance use and harm.
- We have also expanded our understanding of prevention science, including community-based experience as well as scientific research.
- And we continue to see that the landscape of substance use, illicit drug markets, and the availability of (and access to) substances is dynamic and evolving.
- As a cyclical (rather than linear) process, SPF provides room to incorporate developments and emerging threats as often as needed.
The SPF was also unique in its requirement to approach prevention in a cross-sectoral, collaborative manner. The collaborations initially focused on 12 community sectors. Today, this has expanded to include partners involved in SDOH, mental health, injury and violence prevention, suicide prevention and more. These associations generate the knowledge necessary to tackle complex problems, unlock community potential, prevent duplication of effort, encourage synergy, and achieve more with limited resources.
The SPF has two guiding principles, with advice for incorporating each into the five planning steps:
- Cultural competence: to overcome systemic barriers that contribute to disparities and achieve health equity (by nurturing cultural humility, ensuring cultural appropriateness, and including the population of focus in all aspects of planning and evaluation).
- Sustainability: ability to maintain results over time.
Since 2004, 76 states, tribes, territories, and jurisdictions (and thousands of communities) have received funding to implement SPF, and numerous studies have demonstrated its usefulness.
For example, a 2014 evaluation of SAMHSA’s SPF State Incentive Grant (which focused on SPF implementation) highlighted the role of SPF’s structured approach in reducing substance use and improving prevention capacity in funded communities. evaluations from various prevention programs also found that SPF’s holistic approach (in needs assessment, capacity building, planning, implementation and evaluation) led to better outcomes compared to less structured approaches.
The prevention landscape is constantly evolving. Today’s communities face challenges such as underage alcohol use, counterfeit pills (containing lethal amounts of fentanyl), opioids, stimulants, vaping, and (especially in states where laws have changed) marijuana use. SPF offers a clear, systematic method for addressing these issues in thoughtful ways tailored to individual community contexts.
Supported by technical assistance and training, SPF will remain an effective, central part of our nation’s prevention frameworks — for states, tribes, territories, jurisdictions, and communities.
Resources
