Close Menu
Healthtost
  • News
  • Mental Health
  • Men’s Health
  • Women’s Health
  • Skin Care
  • Sexual Health
  • Pregnancy
  • Nutrition
  • Fitness
What's Hot

3 Sti you can catch even if you are using a condom

July 25, 2025

Here’s the ACA Premium hikes

July 24, 2025

Prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction

July 24, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Healthtost
SUBSCRIBE
  • News

    Here’s the ACA Premium hikes

    July 24, 2025

    Coverage exceeds opponents in timely detection of covid mutations

    July 24, 2025

    Forever Chemicals Cross Placenta and breast milk that affect baby immunity

    July 23, 2025

    Targeting of tumor cell stem can keep the key to treating colon cancer more effectively

    July 23, 2025

    Aging skin buckles under pressure leading to wrinkles

    July 22, 2025
  • Mental Health

    How mothers who support mothers can help cover the lack of healthcare and other barriers to care

    July 22, 2025

    Do you have to trust a AI mental health application? -Poic details, privacy risks and 7 -point security checklist

    July 19, 2025

    3 ways Canadians can take control of their finances in a time of economic uncertainty

    July 18, 2025

    Exercise can significantly benefit the mental health of adolescents – here they say the items

    July 13, 2025

    Awareness Month for Mental Health 2025: Turn awareness into action

    July 9, 2025
  • Men’s Health

    Prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction

    July 24, 2025

    30 minutes of full body workout to burn fat and enhance strength

    July 23, 2025

    Erythritol changes brain function and may increase the risk of stroke

    July 21, 2025

    Cardio vs. Training Power: Which is better for shrinking medium -age fat?

    July 21, 2025

    New peak health technologies for all men over 40

    July 20, 2025
  • Women’s Health

    How do you treat the vagina? Effective, non-relief-Vuvatech, non-surgical options

    July 24, 2025

    Probiotics of Multiple Executives for Bowel, Skin and Energy Support

    July 23, 2025

    Power beyond the game: Vicky Fleetwood

    July 22, 2025

    Can you get magnesium with multivitamins and other vitamins?

    July 21, 2025

    I wasn’t tired. I was in heart failure.

    July 20, 2025
  • Skin Care

    Bicarb, magnesium and search for perfect Pit formula

    July 24, 2025

    All thermal flx | About aesthetics

    July 24, 2025

    The bridal flash guide with Joanna Vargas

    July 22, 2025

    Think that your sunscreen protects you? New study probably says no

    July 21, 2025

    Your Guide to Resources: both large and small

    July 20, 2025
  • Sexual Health

    3 Sti you can catch even if you are using a condom

    July 25, 2025

    How to try HIV in Australia: Free, Fast and Private

    July 21, 2025

    Do orgasms change over time?

    July 21, 2025

    7 gender myths collapsing by a special fertility for couples

    July 19, 2025

    New Jersey’s ban on book bans

    July 18, 2025
  • Pregnancy

    67 Perfect Baby Book Inscriptions

    July 24, 2025

    Restore your week with these Storms-Rose Stork

    July 22, 2025

    Why French baby names tend to modern mothers

    July 21, 2025

    Last minute baby gifts that still join each mom

    July 17, 2025

    How to avoid activation and manage it?

    July 16, 2025
  • Nutrition

    45 Vegetable Summer Picnic Recipes

    July 23, 2025

    Episode 007: The Power of Critical Thinking: Why Success requires Brave Options with Sean Croxton

    July 22, 2025

    Do you need a glucose screen if you don’t have diabetes?

    July 22, 2025

    Do you have a dessert? Here is 5 natural GLP-1 foods for dessert

    July 21, 2025

    Grammie + Pea Camp 2025 • Kath eats

    July 20, 2025
  • Fitness

    Jacksonville Hiking Trails: Fresh Air & Fun for all

    July 23, 2025

    My healthy stack of sleep: what I use for deep, restorative rest

    July 23, 2025

    New Dumbbell training for beginners (plus my favorite exercises 💪)

    July 22, 2025

    10 healthy ways to launch steam

    July 22, 2025

    10 high -protein breakfast ideas for weight loss

    July 21, 2025
Healthtost
Home»Sexual Health»A road to equality or morally stormy? — Sexual Health Research Laboratory
Sexual Health

A road to equality or morally stormy? — Sexual Health Research Laboratory

healthtostBy healthtostJanuary 16, 2024No Comments8 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
A Road To Equality Or Morally Stormy? — Sexual Health
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

The term gaydar generally refers to the ability to identify the sexual orientation of others (Miller, 2018). This identification can be based on dynamic (eg, stylistic and grooming choices) or static (eg, facial shape) cues (Rule, 2017). Within the queer community, the utility of gaydar is clear—to identify individuals with whom platonic, romantic, and/or sexual relationships may develop consensually and safely. However, there has been a persistent interest in an empirical kind of gaydar – the scientific identification and classification of the sexual orientation of individuals based on objective evidence. From decades ago comparisons of specific brain structures in gay and straight men (Levay, 1991), to the more recent use of artificial intelligence to differentiate between the faces of gay and straight adults (Wang & Kosinski, 2018), the interest for the empirical gaydar it doesn’t seem to have stopped. The growing body of gaydar research raises questions about its implications, particularly in terms of reinforcing stereotypes. My blog focuses on the context of gaydar research as a way of “legitimizing” minority sexual orientations (eg, gays, lesbians) as a variation of a natural and (partially) biological phenomenon. In particular, the benefits of this view are discussed. In response, the costs of these views, particularly their restrictive focus on the sex/gender binary and exclusively on gay and white identities, are weighed accordingly. Please note that I use the terms “homosexual”, “homosexual/gender”, “gay” and “lesbian” interchangeably.

Many biological explanations of sexual orientation converge on the prenatal hormone theory (PHT), which explains the development of sexual orientation as a result of hormones that determine the external genitalia during fetal development (e.g., Wang & Kosinski, 2018 ). Simply put, PHT suggests that male fetuses exposed to low levels of these hormones, and female fetuses exposed to high levels, are more likely to have same-sex/gender sexual orientation as adults (Vasilovsky, 2018). Accordingly, many gaydar studies have focused on trait variations in gay individuals that deviate from what is typically expected for their gender. These atypical gender characteristics have been assessed primarily in gay men through various “feminization hypotheses” that investigate gendered characteristics such as voice and speech patterns (Daniele et al., 2020; Suire et al., 2020), behaviors (Rieger et al. . , 2008) and facial structure (Wang & Kosinski, 2018).

On the one hand, providing evidence for consistent, biologically driven, early processes underlying sexual orientation may help reduce misconceptions about same-sex/gender orientations as a choice. Importantly, the potential benefits of biological beliefs regarding the development of same-sex/gender sexual orientations should not be underestimated. Indeed, the belief that sexual orientation is caused by biological processes predicts more positive feelings toward people with same-sex/gender orientations and more support for policies aimed at supporting their legal rights, social equality, and moral acceptance (Haider-Markel & (Joslyn, 2008). Furthermore, these beliefs may contribute to the view of sexual orientation as a variable human characteristic, such as how we view extroversion. Importantly, research into sexual interests and behaviors that adopts a lens of differentiation, rather than deviations from expected expressions of sexuality, has helped destigmatize sexual minority identities and behaviors (Bullogh, 2010). Consistent with the belief of same-sex/gender orientations as biologically driven variations within normal sexuality, a commonsense has developed. In particular, it is believed that since homosexuality is a tangible and inherent variation, gay people deserve political and legal protection against discrimination (Vasilovsky, 2018). By this logic, the ability of gaydar research to support this view of same-sex/gender sexual orientation may benefit individuals with these identities.

On the other hand, these supposed advantages of gaydar research are not without criticism. First, biological explanations are often presented to “legitimize” gay/gender sexual orientation, however, they focus primarily on cisgender individuals and white individuals who are classified as either exclusively gay or straight (e.g., Rieger et al., 2008; Wang & Kosinski, 2018). As a result, any appearance of representation or legitimization excludes the large number of sexual minority individuals who are BIPOC, gender diverse, and/or have sexual identities that are not exclusively gay. Importantly, people who are not represented by this research may have the greatest need for representation. For example, bisexual identities are often viewed as more negative and less stable compared to heterosexual or homosexual identities (Burke & LaFrance, 2016). The focus of gaydar research on this highly specific subset of identities ignores the intersectionality of minority identities that exist in sexually and racially diverse populations and are no less deserving of representation than those who hold cisgender, white, gay identities.

Furthermore, the focus on objective, deterministic characteristics that can be used to clearly classify sexual orientation supports the search for the “cause” of sexual minority identities—one that is often channeled into PHT. This theory’s emphasis on sexual binaries ultimately reinforces existing stereotypes surrounding same-sex/gender femininity and masculinity. This is reflected in the overwhelming body of gaydar research that relies on gender atypicality to explain and quantify research findings, which often characterize gay men as feminized and lesbians as masculinized (e.g., Daniele et al., 2020; Lick & Johnson, 2014; Wang & Kosinski). This framework is not without consequences. Adults who report being more gender nonconforming than their peers as children also tend to report feeling more rejected by their parents and peers (Rieger et al., 2008). The gender typicality frame of sexual orientation reinforces ideas of gender atypicality in gay men and lesbians, which may contribute to negative views of homosexuality (Blashill & Powlishta, 2012). As a result of this framing, gender-related stereotypes of sexual minorities are reinforced and the largely unobservable social and psychological complexities that contribute to sexual orientation are ignored. What follows is an idea of ​​sexual orientation that reduces a complex, experiential identity solely to characteristics that can fit neatly into stereotypical categories.

Empirical gaydar reflects a field of inquiry characterized by a degree of moral ambiguity. In many ways, gaydar research has the potential to lead to lasting, positive outcomes for marginalized people. However, the current restrictive focus on people who are white, straight, and exclusively gay leaves people who do not fit this archetype with little of the validation or legitimacy that gaydar research is supposed to provide. Furthermore, on the one hand, identifying natural, uncontrolled, and biologically driven variations that can be used to distinguish same-sex/sexual-orientation individuals from heterosexual individuals may have positive effects for sexually diverse populations. Indeed, beliefs aligned with these naturalistic views tend to go hand in hand with positive views of gay and lesbian identities as well as greater support for their social and legal protection. However, gender stereotyped views of gay and lesbian men and women that are closely linked to salient biological explanations also appear to be related to the rejection of these individuals by their families and peers. This presents a kind of double-edged sword where biological beliefs may be associated with positive outcomes, but the stereotypes that accompany these beliefs may be a source of rejection and distress. At the same time, the female/male dichotomy that is central to much of the available gaydar research reinforces stereotypical views of lesbian women as masculine and homosexuals as feminine. opinions that may lead to prejudice. Intentionally or not, the result is a view of same-sex/gender orientations that reduces individuals to their outwardly observable expressions and ignores the subjective experience of sexual identity.

Evan Waterman (he/him), 4th year BAH Psychology, Queen’s University

bibliographical references

Blashill, AJ & Powlishta, KK (2012). Effects of gender-related domain violations and sexual orientation on perceptions of male and female targets: A parallel study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 411293-1302.

Bullogh, VL (2010). Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey report: Historical overview and lasting contributions. The Journal of Sex Research, 35(2), 127-131.

Burke, SE & LaFrance, M. (2016). Articulate perceptions of sexual minority groups. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45635-650.

Daniele, M., Fasoli, F., Antonio, R., Sulpizio, S. & Maass, A. (2020). Gay Voice: Stable Indicator of Sexual Orientation or Flexible Communication Device? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2585-2600.

Haider-Markel, DP & Joslyn, MR (2008). Belief in the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: An empirical test of attribution theory. Common Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 291-310.

Levay, S. (1991). Difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science, 253(5023), 1034-1037.

Lick, DJ & Johnson, KL (2014). Perceptual foundations of antigay prejudice: Negative evaluations of sexual minority women emerge based on gendered facial characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214538288

Miller, AE (2018). Searching for gaydar: Blind spots in the study of sexual orientation perception. Psychology and sexuality, 9(3), 188-203.

Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, JA, Gygax, L. & Bailey, JM (2008). Sexual orientation and gender nonconformity in childhood: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 46-58.

Canon, NO (2017). Perceptions of sexual orientation from minimal cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46129-139.

Suire, A., Tognetti, A., Durand, V., Raymond, M. & Barkat-Defradas, M. (2020). Acoustic characteristics of speech: A comparison of gay men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2575-2583.

Vasilovsky, AT (2018). Aesthetics as genetics: The epistemological violence of gaydar research. Theory & Psychology, 28(3).

Wang, Y. & Kosinski, M. (2018). Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 246-257.

equality health Laboratory morally research road sexual stormy
bhanuprakash.cg
healthtost
  • Website

Related Posts

3 Sti you can catch even if you are using a condom

July 25, 2025

Early use of smartphone connected to poorer mental health in young adults

July 21, 2025

How to try HIV in Australia: Free, Fast and Private

July 21, 2025

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
Sexual Health

3 Sti you can catch even if you are using a condom

By healthtostJuly 25, 20250

This blog was originally published in 20/09/2021. Last up to date 18/07/2025. Conditions are one…

Here’s the ACA Premium hikes

July 24, 2025

Prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction

July 24, 2025

Bicarb, magnesium and search for perfect Pit formula

July 24, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
TAGS
Baby benefits body brain cancer care Day Diet disease exercise finds Fitness food Guide health healthy heart Improve Life Loss Men mental Natural Nutrition Patients Pregnancy protein research reveals Review risk routine sex sexual Skin study Therapy Tips Top Training Treatment ways weight women Workout
About Us
About Us

Welcome to HealthTost, your trusted source for breaking health news, expert insights, and wellness inspiration. At HealthTost, we are committed to delivering accurate, timely, and empowering information to help you make informed decisions about your health and well-being.

Latest Articles

3 Sti you can catch even if you are using a condom

July 25, 2025

Here’s the ACA Premium hikes

July 24, 2025

Prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction

July 24, 2025
New Comments
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2025 HealthTost. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.