Facial appearance resentment is linked to the fatigue of virtual meeting (VM), which urges the use of impressions management behaviors and leads to a lower intention to adopt VM technologies, according to a study published on February 5, 2025 in the Open-ACcess Journal PLOS ONE by Chayun Lim from the University of Michigan, the US and colleagues.
The increasing dependence on VMS has led to a diffuse VM fatigue experience, which is usually referred to as zoom fatigue. This phenomenon has a significant impact on productivity in the workplace and individual well -being. Despite the crucial role of VM’s fatigue in shaping the workplace interactions and digital integration into emerging virtual work environments, its effects on VM adoption-and mechanisms that associate the concerns of facial appearances, VM fatigue and VM-Remain Underexpplored adoption.
In the new study, Lim and associates responded to the pressing need to understand the VM fatigue mechanism and its consequences for virtual technology in the workplace. Specifically, the researchers investigated the impressions management features that allow users to adjust their self-grocery store to manage their appearance. 2,448 US -based workers were hired to participate in a 15 -minute survey. The sample included professionals, technical or scientific workers who worked at least sometimes and regularly participated in virtual meetings for work. The survey evaluated the negative perceptions of participants about the appearance of their face, as well as impression management behaviors, such as the use of contact to enhance the video and the use of video or avatars filters.
Using structural equation modeling to examine the relationships between each of these factors, the results have shown that people who report increased experience of discontent face, which then leads to greater use of impressions management characteristics. The fatigue caused by facial resentment is linked to users who perceive VMs as less useful, eventually affecting their intention to adopt VM platforms in workplace meetings. Overall, the findings promote an understanding of the psychological mechanisms that govern the fatigue of VM and its influence on the adoption of technology.
Study restrictions include the recruitment of participants exclusively by the US and the design of research, which prevented researchers from identifying the causal relationships between displeasant facial appearance, VM fatigue, impression management and intentions for VMS adoption. According to the authors, future research should hire participants from various cultural contexts and deeper deeper into how current VM features facilitate work in the workplace in ways that support the well-being and socio-psychological needs of workers.
The authors add: “Our study emphasizes that the discontent with the appearance of the face contributes to zoom fatigue, leading to a reduced adoption of virtual meeting technologies. This dissatisfaction also leads to the use of impressions management characteristics, underlining the need to deal with workers’ well -being in virtual communication environments. “
Source:
Magazine report:
Lim, G., et al. (2025) Looking at stance on the virtual workplace: the correlations between zoom fatigue, impressions management and virtual meeting adoption. PLOS ONE. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312354.