To get Angryblacklady Chronicles straight to your inbox, sign up for the Imani newsletter here. Listen to Imani’s monthly podcast, b*tch, listen, here.
Often funny to be Meredith Baxter Gay. You may remember her as Meredith Baxter Birney, the woman who played Elyse Keaton On Family bonds. Came out as a lesbian in 2009, when it was 62. I don’t know why Baxter is stuck in my mind, as the queen “comes out later in life”. Many people have come out late in life, but I am firmly gen x, so somehow became my Queerness Northstar late scene.
When I finally came out at 50 in 2024, it was not particularly dramatic. Was quiet and late. Something inside me waited for years, hitting his leg, I wonder when I would finally be ready to stop pretending. Maybe that’s why I’m writing this column – it provoke a reaction that is more dramatic than “no shit, Imani”.
Going out later in life means that you have already got bad knees and sciatica. I definitely do it. I can no longer eliminate it unless there is a paramedical nearby to lift me up. I lost the whole shiny L word A time because, even though I knew I was at least a little gay around the edges, I had no idea what to do about it. I even lived in Los Angeles when The word l was in the air. I knew all the places I could go if I wanted to spread my gay wings.
But I couldn’t bring myself to do it. I just kept playing and trying to get to know men. I even thought about marrying two different men in my 20s and 30s. And I bless the rain in Africa I didn’t do, because both weddings would have ended up in disaster.
Sometimes I sad about the queer Imani that could tear it in Los Angeles in 2002, but I can’t come back. I can only move on. And I move on with an additional identity that paints the way I move into the world.
And above that, I move through this world under Trump 2.0.
As a black woman, I never needed Donald Trump to show me who she was. We were timed by the jump. Racist, Misogynist, Wannabe Strongman – it was okay there. His first term was frightening. Not at Politics is a dirty waybut in This man will inflate democracy if he makes him feel strong way.
But this time it hits differently. Because now I’m out.
The ‘dark plan’ of the project 2025 for LGBTQ+ rights
When Trump was in the office for the first time, I didn’t live as a woman. I fought his administration on reproductive rights, voting rights, immigration and racial justice in part, pointing out the misinformation and half truths that are the main characteristics of the conservative effort to impose Christian theocracy, them.
This is because I am a person who deeply believes in justice. Hell, I have dedicated my life to reproductive justice, even though I was never pregnant. He never had an abortion. (My girlfriend says it’s because I am extremely intelligent and I hate injustice.)
But I didn’t feel the daily fear of the stomach to watch a government try to delete LGBTQ+ rights while it knew that my life was on the line.
Now I do it.
(Imani’s new podcast falls on September 25, 2025. Subscribe to the explosion! Lawyer be the first to hear that.)
Trump’s first term was almost neutral to humans. He People are forbidden to serve in the army. He cancels guidance by telling schools to protect students Trans. The Ministry of Justice claimed to him in court that Businesses should be able to shoot workers only because they are homosexuals. He proposed protection from non -distinction in healthcare so that doctors refuse to cure trans. He appointed judges who seem to boast of being hostile to LGBTQ+rights.
Now, we have Trump 2.0 – and the design is even darker. Of allies wrote everything down in Project 2025A 900 -page plan to convert the country into Christian nationalist theocracy. Project 2025 is about the restructuring of identity and sexual expression as obscure, its criminalization and the push of people’s LGBTQ+ from public life.
The Supreme Court is already helping this work, as I wrote in July. This past term, the court handed over to Christian conservatives two great victories: Mahmoud v. Taylor and Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton.
In MahmourosReligious parents in Maryland did not want their children to read the right for age LGBTQ+ Uncle Bobby’s marriage; Prince & knight; Pride Puppy! The books of these children contain nothing graphic or clear. They just recognize that there are queer families.
In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court looked like parents. Writing for the majority, Judge Samuel Alito said that parents should take a heads-up and the opportunity to leave any LGBTQ+ content courses until all the secondary review is completed in this case “-a process that could take years.
Alito referred to his argument as “religious freedom”, arguing that the requirement of parents to submit their children to teaching that contradicts their religious beliefs is a burden on religious exercise. But let’s be real: it’s a green light for parents to clean the classroom classrooms. Pressure schools will not create complex exemption systems for children whose parents oppose these texts. They will only pull the books from the classrooms.
Then there is the Coalition of free speech case. The Supreme Court confirmed a Texas law passed in 2023, requiring age verification to access “sexually clear” content online. It sounds like it is for porn, right? But Project 2025 requires a ban on pornography not only in the good, old -fashioned sense of the word. Extends the definition of porn in a way that can Easily interpreted to cover the materials commonly found in a high school librarysuch as books on sexual health, adolescence and sexual orientation and LGBTQ+youth identity.
For the architects of the project 2025, a book about puberty or a novel with queer characters are basically Haunting magazine.
(Read more: Scotus gives the project 2025 two large anti-LGBTQ+ wins)
Put Mahmouros and Coalition of free speech Together, and you see the Playbook: queer identity equals obscene. Queer books? Obscene. Queer websites? Obscene. Pornography; Criminal. Once you collapse all this in the same bucket, it is an open season in people and LGBTQ+.
This is Blueprint Trump and its allies run with. Not only another round of chaos, but a coordinated attempt to delete schools – through schools, libraries, internet and courts.
That is why the second term feels different
It’s not that I didn’t know Trump was dangerous before – I did. But because I’m out now, I feel that these attacks land on a new place.
It’s my life. My love. My recently designed family. My right to be visible without being treated as smuggling or pretending that my girlfriend, Portia, is my sister.
The exit didn’t make Trump more dangerous. Made the danger that is impossible to imagine.
Straight people can treat it as another policy debate. Queer people do not have this luxury. We know that our lives and relationships are negotiating brands in a theocracy that Christian nationalists are trying to build an exception, a ban on the site, a judicial case at a time.
So yes, Trump’s second term strikes differently because the target on my back got bigger than I came to light.
And this is the fist of the bowel: Trump is not just threatening democracy now – threatens the most personal parts of my life.
